Showing posts with label John 1:43-51. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John 1:43-51. Show all posts

Sunday, January 14, 2024

God is calling

Introduction

This morning we have two readings which describe God’s call to a few individuals. The method used in each of the cases is as different as the people who are being called. So, we can safely generalise and say that God’s call is unique, customised for each person.

Recognising God’s Call

Each of us will have experienced God’s call somehow. It may come to you very directly, like it did for Philip, a simple “Follow me”.

It may come as a revelation, some small event of someone saying something, like it did for Nathanael – for whom it just clicked as Jesus was speaking to him.

More likely, though, is a fairly long process of things happening, contacts from church members, whether they are friends already, or newly introduced. Perhaps you were invited to attend church or an evangelistic event. Perhaps you just got involved with doing something and the Christianity around you rubbed-off on you.

Some will not have a conversion moment, if you were brought up in a Christian family, you may just have inherited the belief, but even for you there will be a time when you have to take those beliefs on for yourself and be prepared to stand up and publicly confess them.

Memories

I hope that has sparked some memories for you. As we look at the readings we had from this morning, keep those in mind – we’ll come back to them later.

Hannah

At the start of the first book of Samuel, we meet Hannah and are told about her desire for a son. When she was praying she was accused of drunkenness by Eli the priest. She told him she was not drunk, but deeply troubled, and was pouring out her heart to the Lord. In her prayer, she had promised, “I will give him to the LORD for all the days of his life, and no razor will ever be used on his head.”

Her prayer had been answered, and she had handed the boy over to Eli when he was old enough to be separated from his mother. She didn’t lose touch with him, though, and continued to provide for him, and he grew up under Eli’s guidance.

Samuel

When Samuel was old enough, the Lord called him. We have no idea what Samuel thought, whether he was a believer or a sceptic, but we know he was obedient to Eli. We are told that “the word of the Lord was rare”, so Samuel’s call would be unexpected – especially by Eli. Nevertheless, late one evening, before the lamp of the God had gone out, Samuel was called.

The lamp of God was a seven pronged oil lamp, which was lit at dusk, and gave light into the evening. Then God called Samuel, but because this sort of thing was very unusual, Samuel thought it was Eli. It took Eli a while to realise what was happening. On the fourth call, Samuel was ready and instead of going to Eli, he said ‘Speak, your servant is listening’. The message was a difficult one for a young boy to deal with, you can read the rest of the story in the remainder of chapter 3. Now, Samuel had met God, and his life has changed. He is God’s prophet for the rest of his life. His word became synonymous with God’s word.

NT Reading

In our New Testament reading, Jesus has just started His ministry and is calling His disciples. Two joined from John’s followers, one of those was Andrew, and he introduced his brother Simon. On the second day, Jesus went out looking for disciples in Galilee. It is not clear whether Jesus went to Galilee specifically to call Philip, or whether He was just looking for Galilean followers. Philip, though, was from the same place as Andrew and Peter, so my guess is that Jesus went to find Philip.

Philip

Philip’s call is simple ‘Follow me’ and there is no discussion, Philip simply obeys. He then goes and finds Nathanael, and the discussion that follows requires some careful attention.

Philip & Nathanael

Let’s look first at the conversation between Philip and Nathanael.

Philip starts with:

“We have found the one Moses wrote about in the Law, and about whom the prophets also wrote —Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.”

Not surprisingly Nathanael is a bit confused by this, after all the prophecy say that the messiah will come from … Bethlehem. It’s there in the prophet Micah (5:2):

‘But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah,
though you are small among the clans of Judah, out of you will come for me
one who will be ruler over Israel,
whose origins are from of old,
from ancient times.’

Nazareth

Also, Nazareth has a bit of a reputation among the Galileans. Although it’s quite close to trade routes, it’s fairly inaccessible from the rest of the region, so it is looked down on.

We know that good can come from anywhere, but Nathanael is not so sure.

Come and see

Philip’s response is not an argument, instead he gives an invitation – ‘Come and see’, come and judge for yourself. This is the classic response. Alway offer a person the chance to make up their own mind instead of trying to convince them yourself. Even the Psalmist makes the same invitation (34:8)

Taste and see that the Lord is good;

So, off they go.

Conversation with Jesus

Then we have this conversation with Jesus that is a little perplexing when you first read it. Let me read those verses again:

47 When Jesus saw Nathanael approaching, he said of him, “Here is a true Israelite, in whom there is nothing false.”
48 “How do you know me?” Nathanael asked. Jesus answered, “I saw you while you were still under the fig tree before Philip called you.”
49 Then Nathanael declared, “Rabbi, you are the Son of God; you are the King of Israel.”
50 Jesus said, “You believe because I told you I saw you under the fig tree. You shall see greater things than that.”
51 He then added, “I tell you the truth, you shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending on the Son of Man.”

Explanation

What a strange way to greet someone, “Here is a true Israelite, in whom there is nothing false.” Already judging his character. Why would Jesus do that?

The clue we need is in verse 50 and 51. In verse 50 Jesus is talking to Nathanael – the ‘you’ is singular, and in 51 he is talking to everyone around him, the ‘you’ is plural. But that sentence is aimed at Nathanael. Jesus is talking about Jacob’s ladder. That featured in a dream that Jacob had, where the ladder allowed the angels to climb from heaven to earth and back. The story is in Genesis 28.

Jacob

Jacob was a ‘real piece of work’. He lied and cheated his way through life, even cheating his older twin brother, Esau, out of his inheritance. Now, I’m assuming that you all understood the phrase I used - ‘real piece of work’. In my head at least it means disreputable and to be avoided where ever possible.

Under the fig tree

Well, there is a similar type of phrase in verses 48 & 50 – ‘under the fig tree’. It apparently means that the person it refers to is meditating on the word of God. At the point where he meets Jesus, Nathanael has been meditating on the word we now know as Genesis 28. So he is greeted by Jesus effectively saying “Here is a true Israelite, nothing like Jacob at all.”

That’s why the greeting gets such a reaction from Nathanael. It’s his light bulb moment (there’s another phrase, that I hope we all understand). He doesn’t need any more convincing, if the person he’s being introduced to as the messiah, can tell him his own thoughts, then he must be the Messiah.

Miraculous Call

So, Nathanael’s call is one where he is on the receiving end of a very personal miracle.

Jesus call’s the Woman at the well to belief in a similar way – by telling her ‘everything she ever did’ (John 4:29).  That was Jacob’s well, an interesting link, but not for today.

Other call’s to belief

As I’ve said, everyone’s call from God is different. Here are a couple of others just to illustrate how different they can be.

C. S. Lewis

After a long struggle to remain an atheist, C. S. Lewis reports that he said this to his friend:

"You must picture me alone in that room at Magdalen (pronounced Maudlin), night after night, feeling, whenever my mind lifted even for a second from my work, the steady, unrelenting approach of Him whom I so earnestly desired not to meet. That which I greatly feared had at last come upon me. In the Trinity Term of 1929 I gave in, and admitted that God was God, and knelt and prayed: perhaps, that night, the most dejected and reluctant convert in all England"

J Hudson Taylor

James Hudson Taylor, the founder of the China Inland Mission, denounced the faith of his parents as a very young man. At 16, after reading an evangelistic tract pamphlet entitled "Poor Richard", he professed faith in Christ.

Reluctant convert

Both these men had an enormous impact on Christianity, yet both were reluctant converts and the way they were called to faith was very different.

Different Call

My story, and yours will be very different, but each of us was chosen and called to faith by God. Our response to that call has changed our lives. There may have been lots of steps, both forward and backward on the way, but the actual call is always “Follow me”, just as it was to Philip. And just as it was for Philip, we were sought out. You, like me and a lot of others, may not have realised at the time that the messiah was calling you.

Who’s next?

He is still calling, both to us, to come closer, but also to others to ‘Follow Him’.

You may well know people who you think God might be calling, I expect you know people who He is calling. They may not be the same people. One day, maybe soon, they will hear the call and take that final step into the Christian faith. It might come through a conversation, a pamphlet, a visit to church, through watching a live stream, or even something you, or I say or do – but it will come.

I’m just happy to have the opportunity to play some small part in that process for anyone that I can.

References 

https://www.workingpreacher.org/commentaries/revised-common-lectionary/second-sunday-after-epiphany-2/commentary-on-john-143-51-3

https://sermonwriter.com/sermons/new-testament-john-143-51-gods-dream-team-mclarty/

https://cepreaching.org/commentary/2021-01-11/john-143-51-3/

https://www.sermoncentral.com/sermons/mission-to-galilee-christopher-holdsworth-sermon-on-galilee-180507

https://www.sermoncentral.com/sermons/the-continual-call-of-disciples-ron-tuit-sermon-on-discipleship-191229

https://www.sermoncentral.com/sermons/jesus-knows-shawn-drake-sermon-on-disciples-244610

https://www.ewtn.com/catholicism/library/conversion-story-of-c-s-lewis-9821

https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2019/december/dikkon-eberhart-reform-orthodox-jew-cross-road-christ.html

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_Taylor

https://www.oneindia.com/india/how-india-is-battling-the-dirty-game-of-christian-conversions-3504569.html

Preached

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJL62kb2fJo Start 18:26–32:25


Monday, December 10, 2012

John 1:43-51 @ Christ Church on 15 Jan 2012

Who were Philip and Nathanael ?

Although Philip is from Bathsaida his name is greek – it means Horse Lover. He was probably a fisherman. Little is known of what happened to him after the resurrection. Some say he travelled in Asia Minor with his sister Marianne and Nathanael. Clement says that he lived into old age (so was not martyred), but all we know is that he is called Philip and is from Bethsaida. He is not the same Philip that is found in Acts speaking to the Ethiopean.
Nathanael is equally mysterious. He is almost certainly known as Bartholomew in the other Gospels. Bartholomew means son of the furrows, perhaps indicating that he was a ploughman. In each gospel he is mentioned with Philip.

Philip

We have no information about why Philip responded to Jesus. After getting his first two disciples from John (Andrew and Peter), Jesus decides to go to Galilee. On the way he finds Philip, says “Follow me” and its done. I can't believe that it was really that straight forward, its simply that the full story is lost to us.

Nathanael

Nathanael, on the other hand, is much more interesting. He was obviously already good friends with Philip. After his calling by Jesus Nathanael is the first one to be told. Philip has obviously had some significant conversations with Jesus already. – even before the first miracle that is recorded. Turning water into wine occurs in the next chapter. Philip has already recognised who Jesus is. We can tell this by the way he passes the news on to Nathanael: “We have found the one Moses wrote about in the Law, and about whom the prophets also wrote”. Philip means the Messiah.

Messiah expected soon

There was a high level of expectation in Israel in the 1st Century that the Messiah would be sent by God to free the Israelites from Roman rule. Just as He had sent Moses to free the Israelites from Egyptian rule hundreds of years before. The Jewish people were looking out for someone who would fit the bill, and there were many who appeared to and then failed. Philip had identified his candidate and went to tell his friend.

Nazareth

His last seven words though ruined it for Nathanael. “Jesus of Nazareth – the son of Joseph”. Nazareth clearly did not have a good reputation amongst Galileans, perhaps that explains why Joseph and Mary were able to settle there. “Nazareth! Can anything good come from there?” Philip is still full of enthusiasm “Come and See.”

Nathanael

As Jesus sees Nathanael approaching he says “Here is a true Israelite, in whom there is nothing false.” If I was greeted like that, I would be taken aback. That appears to have been Nathanael's reaction.
How do you know me?”. Does his response suggest to you that he may have thought he was being stalked? He certainly sounds defensive and uncomfortable – but then who wouldn't be if their character was summed up by a complete stranger.
Jesus' answer “I saw you while you were still under the fig tree before Philip called you.” may sound simple to us. So Nathaniel was sitting (presumably) under a fig tree and Jesus passed by. How would Jesus draw the conclusion that there was “nothing false” in Nathanael from that? And how would that explain any of the conversation that follows?

Under a fig tree

Well the phrase 'under a fig tree' was used in the 1st Century to describe someone studying or meditating on scripture. That helps explain it. Jesus had seen Nathanael studying and had even seen what he was reading. Jesus may have meant it quite literally, or He may have been given a word of knowledge. Either way it impressed Nathanael.

Titles for Jesus

It impressed him enough for him to respond “Rabbi, you are the Son of God; you are the King of Israel.” “Son of God” is the description that John the Baptist give of Jesus when he is describing him to his own disciples. For John it was a revelation that God had given him. “King of Israel” is a title that Jesus would be given from time to time and which He seemed less pleased to accept.
Nathanaels response is quite a turn around from his derogatory remarks about Nazareth. I struggle to shake off the impression that Jesus is laughing at him slightly in the next response.

Read Genesis 28:10-17

Before we look at that it will be helpful if we too spend a minute under the fig tree.
Please turn to Genesis 28 verse 10.

I'm going to read verses 10-17
Remember that Jacob had lied and schemed and cheated his brother Easu out of his inheritance. Here God speaks to him in a dream.
Ge 28:10 Jacob left Beersheba and set out for Haran. When he reached a certain place, he stopped for the night because the sun had set. Taking one of the stones there, he put it under his head and lay down to sleep. He had a dream in which he saw a stairway resting on the earth, with its top reaching to heaven, and the angels of God were ascending and descending on it. There above it stood the LORD, and he said: “I am the LORD, the God of your father Abraham and the God of Isaac. I will give you and your descendants the land on which you are lying. Your descendants will be like the dust of the earth, and you will spread out to the west and to the east, to the north and to the south. All peoples on earth will be blessed through you and your offspring. I am with you and will watch over you wherever you go, and I will bring you back to this land. I will not leave you until I have done what I have promised you.” When Jacob awoke from his sleep, he thought, “Surely the LORD is in this place, and I was not aware of it.” He was afraid and said, “How awesome is this place! This is none other than the house of God; this is the gate of heaven.”
Let's assume that the passage I have just read is the one, or at least part of the one that Nathanael was reading.

Nathanael recognied Jesus

Remember, Nathanael has recognised Jesus for who he is on the strength of either a careful piece of observation of a simple word of knowledge. Jesus replies “You believe because I told you I saw you under the fig tree. You shall see greater things than that.” Then goes on to add “I tell you the truth, you shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending on the Son of Man.”
I'd just love to hear the rest of the conversation. Where did it go from there? What did Nathanael say next? The narrative moves on, so we can never know, but we can get a better understanding of Jesus' last statement.

Jesus' promise

Jesus picks up on the scripture that Nathanael was reading and promises that he will see greater things. Why shouldn't he – he has already been identified as a true Israelite, a truthful Israelite. By comparison Jacob was anything but truthful, yet God spoke to Jacob, and made a promise to be with him.

Son of man

Jesus ends with the title 'Son of Man' – a favourite title that Jesus gave himself, but how would Nathanael have understood it.
The phrase 'son of man' in the Old Testament (in our translation) appears in Psalms, Ezekiel, and Daniel. Mostly it simply means human being. In Daniel 7:13 in the dream of the four beasts, it clearly refers to the messiah, so it is quite possible that Nathanael would have understood it as confirmation of Philips statement 'We have found the one Moses wrote about in the Law, and about whom the prophets also wrote” - The Messiah. If he did he may also have realised that Jesus is saying that he is the way to heaven. An oblique reference perhaps to the fact that he would die for our sins and therefore make it possible to be once again connected to heaven.

Recognising Jesus

We don't have the luxury of a face-to-face meeting with Jesus, so I wondered what it was that triggered my belief. It certainly wasn't a simple word of knowledge, for me it was a much longer process. I had been attending church for a while and had been working through a number of things that might prevent me from believing. Was the Christian faith rational – the world I lived in was ordered and could be made sense of (at some level) – if Christianity denied that, I was never going to join. Those things over it was Jesus in the people I was friends with that finally made the difference.
Think back – what were the influences on your life that made you recognise that Jesus was the son of God? What was the one thing – if there was just one thing that first made you believe?
For Philip it may have been a command.
For Nathaniel it was Jesus' words: “Here is a true Israelite, in whom there is nothing false.”
For Jacob it was a dream.
Everyone has something that triggered their belief, or will trigger their belief.
All we can do is introduce them to Jesus and let Him do the rest.