Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Are we more concerned about living LIKE a king, or living FOR a king?

Palm Sunday 1 Apr 2012 at Christ church, Billericay

Zechariah 9:9-13 & Mark 11:1-11

Introduction

What do you think of Elizabeth?

What do you think of Elizabeth? Not, our youth worker – whose away at her friends wedding, nor our band leader, but Elizabeth II, our queen. It's her diamond jubilee year. Very few kings or queens make it this far – that's one of the advantages of living in a constitutional monarchy, the king does not have to lead the troops from the front.
Most people have only known the one monarch so it may be a little difficult to make an evaluation, but anyway do you think she is a good queen? What could she have done better?

Make Jesus King

In the passage for today we see the crowds have another attempt to install Jesus as their King. So I thought it would be a good idea to look at some kings and queens to see what they were like and whether we think they would make an ideal monarch.

Good king / bad king.

I'll start with a list of 4 monarchs that I think are good and then look at four who are not so good.
Edward I – his reforms of criminal law are still (just) the basis for most of our criminal law today.
Elizabeth I – had a conciliatory approach to the feuding Catholics and Protestants in the land, and established the Church of England. Her reign is still seen as something of a golden age.
Henry VIII – Henry's energy in the early part of his reign was responsible for setting the framework for Elizabeth's golden age.
Richard I – The lion heart. He was a brilliant military leader, commanding his own force at the age of 16.
Now for some bad kings:
John – probably tops everyone's list of bad kings, having tried to usurp his brother. He was also known to be petty and spiteful.
Charles I – had a very strong belief in the divine right of Kings lead to a fatal split with parliament and resulted in the English civil war, which he then lost!
George III - his focus on war with France and his attempt to raise taxes from colonists lead to the loss of the American colonies.
Henry VIII - had a flagrant disregard for the law which led him to behead his wives. His concern was to produce a male heir, at the expense of everything else.

Ideal King

So there we have seven monarchs from our history. All of them had some good qualities, but what would an ideal King be like?
Here are a few Ideas:
Wise, like Solomon
Strong, like Richard I, or Churchill
Decisive
Fair, like Eadwig (955 - 959)
Proactive, like Henry VIII
Dutiful, like Elizabeth II
Charismatic, like Edward I
Natural Leader
Merciful, like Richard I
Subject to his own Laws

Living Under a King

For us, of course, it doesn't matter very much. How will England change when Charles III takes the throne? It probably won't affect your daily life.
In Jesus time the ruler had a significant influence on daily life. They decided if there would be war or peace. Many wars have been fought solely to satisfy a kings pride, which were nothing to do with the security of the nation. If there was to be war, there would have to be money raised, so new taxes would be imposed. If the King came to visit, he would have to be given the best room in town. (Yes! Given! Even Elizabeth II does not carry money!). If the King asked for anything, however bizarre it would be done for him.

Jews wish for a king

The Jewish nation wanted their own king, they had been conquered many times – that is not an experience that we can easily understand. They were currently part of the Roman Empire. The taxes that were raised were used to support Roman military efforts, and even worse than that the customs and practices of their religion were restricted. The people were looking for someone who could lead them to freedom, to self determination.
They looked back to the reign of king David, when they had defeated their enemies and all was well with the Kingdom (hindsight is a wonderful thing).

Jesus for King – the crowd

There were huge crowds in and around Jerusalem, they have come for the passover festival – perhaps the biggest festival of the year. When the Olympics start later this year we will get a sense of the impact that a huge number of visitors can make on an area. There are people everywhere. They have come to remember the time that Moses led the people out of slavery and into the promised land. They are looking for a repeat performance from someone – from anyone. They are hoping for a miracle cure, a cure that would see the nation restored to its former glory – to independence and self determination. This time they are not going to run away, they want the Romans kicked out.

Jesus for King – the donkey

It's at this point that Jesus decides to demonstrate who he is. He clearly signals to them that He is their king. Remember the reading from Zechariah:
Zec 9:9 Rejoice greatly, O Daughter of Zion!  Shout, Daughter of Jerusalem! See, your king 17 comes to you, righteous and having salvation, gentle and riding on a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey. 
The crowd could not miss the sign. They recognised their new king immediately and began praising him. They grab anything they can and use their coats as a 'red carpet' to welcome their honoured guest. For someone this important, even the donkey must not walk on the dusty, dirty earth.
A donkey is a symbol of peace and humility.
Hosanna means 'save' and it had become an expression of praise. A recognition of the fact that God had saved His people many times in their history.

Praise and expectation

The praise and the expectation are high. John's account tells us that the crowd who had seen him raise Lazarus from the tomb were there shouting their praises, and that the story of Lazarus spread through out the crowd. A prophet who can raise the dead was something that Israel had not seen since Elijah.
Jesus enters the city and then moves on to the temple. He enters the temple and takes a look around at everything. That's odd, because He had been there lots of times before. Jesus is planning what he will do next – tomorrow he will purify the temple.

Living Under the King

For whatever reason, and there are many theories, the crowd will turn on Jesus and reject him as their king or as their messiah (saviour). After his death and resurrection his disciples would see that He is in reality King of the world, not just King of the Jews (even if that title was finally given to Him by Pilot).
His followers would recognise that as King and Saviour Jesus has a special call on their lives. We as his followers should also recognise this.
Christians live under an absent King. Jesus is in charge, but not completely in this world, in this time.
How do we respond to living under a king?
It's something that we are not used to, and no longer has any meaning in our culture. Here are some questions – see how you respond to them.
Are we willing to follow the king's orders even when they puzzle us?
Is 55:8 “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways,”
            declares the LORD.
9 “As the heavens are higher than the earth,
   so are my ways higher than your ways
   and my thoughts than your thoughts.
Try to interpret what God is saying, if it is not un-biblical, then obey. This can be difficult, how are you going to answer the question “Why did you do that?”
Are we ready to go out of our way to follow him?
In today's world a commitment to attend worship every Sunday can seem peculiar and fanatical. Worship is reserved for celebrities and sports stars, and some of them – the real fans – the fanatical ones will follow their heroes every week. Most don't. Jesus was a celebrity in his procession to the temple, but the crowd soon turned on him. Celebrity can be fickle. As a king he asks that we put one day aside each and every week, and stop our regular work. That day should be dedicated to Him, and used to prepare our selves for the week ahead. That's the day when we get together to worship Him.
If that's hard, supposing the king were to ask you to travel to a foreign land and live there among the people, so that you could tell them about him?
Here are a few quotes from Eric Liddel, the runner at the 1924 Olympics who refused to run on Sunday and afterwards became a missionary in China.
“One word stands out from all others as the key to knowing God, to having his peace and assurance in your heart; it is OBEDIENCE.”
“HAPPINESS is to have enough for the day's needs with always some to spare for those who have not.“
"The kingdom is where the King reigns. If He is reigning in my heart, then the Kingdom of Heaven has come to me."
What are our equivalent of cloaks?
In Jesus time most people would have owned only one cloak. It was the only outer garment for protection against the cold. Here they lay their cloaks on the ground in honour of their king, not considering the cost. Perhaps the nearest equivalent today would be your car. This question is really asking what of value we are prepared to put at risk in honour of our king? How many of those folks got their cloak back? How many got them back without any damage?
Has our God become domesticated and trivialised, a mere helping hand through the tough times of life?
Or is He really a King to us?


Are we more concerned about living LIKE a king, or living FOR a king?

Thursday, February 07, 2013

The Transfiguration - Mark 9:2-9 @ Christ Church 19 February 2012

Reading – Mark 9:2-9
The Transfiguration

Introduction

This talk will be in the form of a quiz, loosely based on Who wants to be a millionaire. The main difference being there is no million pound prize. Indeed no prize of any sort. Also the only qualification for taking part is volunteering. So I'd like four volunteers first please.
The rules are quite simple. I'll give you a minute to think and then ask you to show the letter in response to the question.
If you're not sure there's phone a friend and ask the audience, but no 50-50.
I'll explain those if we get to them.
After each answer I'll say a few words about what we have read.
[organise volunteers]
  1. Complete the sentence “Jesus went up the mountain …”
    A) to find the lost sheep
    B) with his best friendsC) to be alone with God
    D) to build a shelter
    Jesus was with Peter James and John. They were the three men who were closest to him – his best friends. They would all play important roles in the development of the Christian faith, but for now Jesus was teaching them about God and helping them get to know Him better.
    It's important to remember that Jesus, Peter, James and John are all Jews. They have all grown up with the books of our Old Testament being read to them, probably every day.
  2. What happened to Jesus on the mountain?
    A) metamorphosis
    B) transmutation
    C) transmogrification
    D) conversion
    The word in the reading is not in the list of choices. So what does transfiguration really mean.
    [Harry Potter Slide]
    Well J K Rowling got it wrong in Harry Potter.
    Lets look at the other words and see the real meanings of each.
    Transmutation is a description of the work of the alchemists – those ancient scientists trying to turn lead into gold. They were trying to alter the essential substance of a material from one type to another. That is not what happened to Jesus.
    [Cat Slide]
    Transmogrification is closer. It means to change into a different shape or form, one that is bizarre or fantastical. It doesn't have to be a cat!
    Conversion also means changing one thing to another, but is a general term and is not specific enough to describe the events in today's reading.
    Metamorphosis is the biological process by which caterpillars turn into butterflies. It means that the form of the creature changes, but the substance (the 'stuff' that it's made of) stays the same.
    That's what happened to Jesus. His appearance changed. You could say that God began to show through.
  3. Who joined them on the Mountain?
    A) the other disciples
    B) Paul & Timothy
    C) Moses and Elijah
    D) The centurion
    Moses and Elijah.
    [Who were Moses and Elijah?]
    Moses and Elijah represent the Law and the Prophets. Do you remember that I said Jesus, Peter, James and John would have known the old testament well. Two important parts of the old testament are the Law and the prophets.
    The Law, mostly in the first five books was given to Moses by God, - do you remember the story of the 10 commandments?
    The prophets were men and women who spoke God's words to the people of Israel. They were often murdered for telling unpopular truths.
    Jesus said in Matthew 5v17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.
    And in Luke 24:44 after His resurrection “This is what I told you while I was still with you: Everything must be fulfilled that is written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets and the Psalms.”
    These things would help the Leaders of the Church understand how to develop their beliefs within the Jewish faith.
  4. While Jesus was shining the disciples were
    A) preparing to leave
    B) arguing
    C) building a house
    D) very frightened
    Imagine it! - well try to imagine it. It's almost impossible.
    [Transfiguration picture]
    The picture is an inadequate representation of the event. Matthew 17:2 says “His face shone like the sun, and his clothes became as white as the light.” So it would have been impossible to look at him.
    The person you have been with for three years suddenly starts to emit light. A light so white and so bright that it almost blinds you. You cannot look directly at him any more – he is just too bright.
    I'd be frightened, so I'm not surprised that the disciples were.
  5. What happened while Jesus was shining?
    A) the weather turned
    B) a cloud covered them
    C) it began to get dark
    D) the sun came out
    Exodus 19:9:
    The LORD said to Moses, “I am going to come to you in a dense cloud, so that the people will hear me speaking with you and will always put their trust in you.”
    In Exodus 33:20 God says “you cannot see my face, for no one may see me and live.”
    [Cloud cover slide]
    Since Moses' encounter with God, a cloud has always signified the presence of God. Here it is no different. The cloud hides God's face, but not his voice.
  6. What did the voice say?
    A) This is my son
    B) I love my son
    C) Follow Him
    D) Listen to Him
    This is one of those questions where the Christ church rules are different from the real rules. God's voice from the cloud said “this is my son”, “whom I love” and “Listen to Him”. The voice is confirming what the rest of the vision had suggested – that Jesus is God's son.
    Unlike at his baptism this message was entirely for the disciples. They must have already known that Jesus was special. Now they knew just how special.
  7. As they came down the mountain Jesus told the disciples
    A) Keep it secret for nowB) The plan to visit Jerusalem
    C) That he was going to be killed
    D) Meet back here next week
[Complete the competition]
“Don't tell anyone about this until ….” Can you keep a secret? Sometimes keeping a secret can be very difficult. I can remember times when I've almost let slip and ruined the surprise for someone. In this case though I doubt the disciples had too much trouble. What they had seen was pretty fantastic, and now they were being asked to keep it secret until after the 'son of man' had risen from the dead.
“Son of Man” is a title that Jesus used of himself, so the disciples would have understood what he was talking about.

What does it all mean for us?

What can a vision given to three men over two thousand years ago mean to us today?
We've seen how the vision confirmed that Jesus was the son of God. The glory of God shone through him and out to the watchers, the whiteness symbolizing holiness and purity. Moses the giver of the Law and the rescuer of Israel appears, linking Jesus with the very origins of the Jewish faith.
Malachi 4:5 “See, I will send the prophet Elijah to you before that great and dreadful day of the LORD comes.”
Elijah, the greatest prophet, a man everyone expected to return and announce the coming Messiah appears, and both talk with Jesus.
Then there is the voice from the cloud. God says: “This is my son, whom I love, Listen to Him.”.
Prior to this vision Jesus had been teaching his disciples about his forthcoming death and Peter had recognised Him as the Messiah.
The vision served to help solidify those realisations. It can do the same for us. It helps us to see where Jesus fits into the history of God's redemption of the World.
Jesus knew that he was soon to die at the hands of the Romans and that His voluntary death would give people a way back to the relationship with God they were intended to have.
After his resurrection the disciples would have remembered the vision – even assuming that they'd somehow forgotten it – and that, along with everything else they had seen would have helped them understand that their rescue from death was possible.
If you can't take any of that there is at least God's command to listen to Jesus.
The Million Dollar Question really understates what is at stake here.
It's a life and death question we're finding answers for.
Final Answer Slide - 21
Final Answer?

Sunday, January 27, 2013

America & Guns (The NRA)

An English visitor's point of view, as he attempts to understand why many Americans must have a gun.  This discussion was created during and after my visit.  Helpful comments are encouraged.



Clearly I cannot hope to properly understand “The Gun Debate” even if there is such a thing.  The shootings in Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut made the international news and we caught some of the debate on the radio (BBC world service), and on TV (I have no idea which channel) I thought I should note down my thoughts, and my puzzlement.
I understand that the Second Amendment allows for the possession and use or fire arms for legal purposes, such as self defence.  This right was refined in 2008 and 2010, even strengthened.  I have since read one article that says the 2nd amendment allows for militia, and is not aimed at private ownership.
I heard part of the NRA statement on the radio.  The line seems to be “To stop a bad guy with a gun you need a good guy with a gun.”
In August 2012 a disgruntled employee went and shot a former colleague in New York.  Without the response that followed it would be a simple murder.  However, the police response resulted in the offender being shot and 9 people being wounded. http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/24/justice/new-york-empire-state/index.html The wounded were all caught in the cross-fire, hit by police, in the early reports. An investigation is under-way – not surprising.  We are very lucky that no innocent passers-by were actually killed, good guys with guns do not always behave appropriately.
On the TV there were loads of statistics on gun deaths; Japan was used as an example, as the number there is effectively zero.  The culture is very different, perhaps too different.  European comparisons may be more valid.  Here the numbers are very low. 
One of the problems is quantity.  Sure ‘bad guys’ kill people, not good guys, if the ‘bad guys’ have a low powered single shot weapon, with few bullets stored in it, they will kill fewer people.  When a man with a knife went berserk in a hospital in China, lots of children were injured, but none were killed, had he had a semi-automatic rifle things would have been different.
Why is it that most industrialised (first world) countries do not permit their citizen to own guns freely and why do those citizens generally accept the restriction?
For me it is about security.  There is a problem with knife crime in a few areas in the UK.  The message to the young men concerned is ‘don’t take a knife, or you will get hurt’.  Those that are hurt usually claim that they had the knife for self defence.  The problem is that they don’t really know how to use it, so with a weapon they are at a bigger disadvantage than if they were unarmed.  But they are frightened, so feel they need protection. From the responses I have heard to the question "Why would/do you own a gun?" the situation is the same - it is for defence.  Defence from others who may be using their gun in a less than legal way.
This short video clip also helps us to understand that their history links gun ownership to freedom, and exposes their fear of their own government.: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-21126850#TWEET543020.
It seems then, that Americans live in fear.  What will it take for them to experience truer freedom?  Can the descendants of the pioneers be brave enough to change their culture?

Monday, December 10, 2012

John 1:43-51 @ Christ Church on 15 Jan 2012

Who were Philip and Nathanael ?

Although Philip is from Bathsaida his name is greek – it means Horse Lover. He was probably a fisherman. Little is known of what happened to him after the resurrection. Some say he travelled in Asia Minor with his sister Marianne and Nathanael. Clement says that he lived into old age (so was not martyred), but all we know is that he is called Philip and is from Bethsaida. He is not the same Philip that is found in Acts speaking to the Ethiopean.
Nathanael is equally mysterious. He is almost certainly known as Bartholomew in the other Gospels. Bartholomew means son of the furrows, perhaps indicating that he was a ploughman. In each gospel he is mentioned with Philip.

Philip

We have no information about why Philip responded to Jesus. After getting his first two disciples from John (Andrew and Peter), Jesus decides to go to Galilee. On the way he finds Philip, says “Follow me” and its done. I can't believe that it was really that straight forward, its simply that the full story is lost to us.

Nathanael

Nathanael, on the other hand, is much more interesting. He was obviously already good friends with Philip. After his calling by Jesus Nathanael is the first one to be told. Philip has obviously had some significant conversations with Jesus already. – even before the first miracle that is recorded. Turning water into wine occurs in the next chapter. Philip has already recognised who Jesus is. We can tell this by the way he passes the news on to Nathanael: “We have found the one Moses wrote about in the Law, and about whom the prophets also wrote”. Philip means the Messiah.

Messiah expected soon

There was a high level of expectation in Israel in the 1st Century that the Messiah would be sent by God to free the Israelites from Roman rule. Just as He had sent Moses to free the Israelites from Egyptian rule hundreds of years before. The Jewish people were looking out for someone who would fit the bill, and there were many who appeared to and then failed. Philip had identified his candidate and went to tell his friend.

Nazareth

His last seven words though ruined it for Nathanael. “Jesus of Nazareth – the son of Joseph”. Nazareth clearly did not have a good reputation amongst Galileans, perhaps that explains why Joseph and Mary were able to settle there. “Nazareth! Can anything good come from there?” Philip is still full of enthusiasm “Come and See.”

Nathanael

As Jesus sees Nathanael approaching he says “Here is a true Israelite, in whom there is nothing false.” If I was greeted like that, I would be taken aback. That appears to have been Nathanael's reaction.
How do you know me?”. Does his response suggest to you that he may have thought he was being stalked? He certainly sounds defensive and uncomfortable – but then who wouldn't be if their character was summed up by a complete stranger.
Jesus' answer “I saw you while you were still under the fig tree before Philip called you.” may sound simple to us. So Nathaniel was sitting (presumably) under a fig tree and Jesus passed by. How would Jesus draw the conclusion that there was “nothing false” in Nathanael from that? And how would that explain any of the conversation that follows?

Under a fig tree

Well the phrase 'under a fig tree' was used in the 1st Century to describe someone studying or meditating on scripture. That helps explain it. Jesus had seen Nathanael studying and had even seen what he was reading. Jesus may have meant it quite literally, or He may have been given a word of knowledge. Either way it impressed Nathanael.

Titles for Jesus

It impressed him enough for him to respond “Rabbi, you are the Son of God; you are the King of Israel.” “Son of God” is the description that John the Baptist give of Jesus when he is describing him to his own disciples. For John it was a revelation that God had given him. “King of Israel” is a title that Jesus would be given from time to time and which He seemed less pleased to accept.
Nathanaels response is quite a turn around from his derogatory remarks about Nazareth. I struggle to shake off the impression that Jesus is laughing at him slightly in the next response.

Read Genesis 28:10-17

Before we look at that it will be helpful if we too spend a minute under the fig tree.
Please turn to Genesis 28 verse 10.

I'm going to read verses 10-17
Remember that Jacob had lied and schemed and cheated his brother Easu out of his inheritance. Here God speaks to him in a dream.
Ge 28:10 Jacob left Beersheba and set out for Haran. When he reached a certain place, he stopped for the night because the sun had set. Taking one of the stones there, he put it under his head and lay down to sleep. He had a dream in which he saw a stairway resting on the earth, with its top reaching to heaven, and the angels of God were ascending and descending on it. There above it stood the LORD, and he said: “I am the LORD, the God of your father Abraham and the God of Isaac. I will give you and your descendants the land on which you are lying. Your descendants will be like the dust of the earth, and you will spread out to the west and to the east, to the north and to the south. All peoples on earth will be blessed through you and your offspring. I am with you and will watch over you wherever you go, and I will bring you back to this land. I will not leave you until I have done what I have promised you.” When Jacob awoke from his sleep, he thought, “Surely the LORD is in this place, and I was not aware of it.” He was afraid and said, “How awesome is this place! This is none other than the house of God; this is the gate of heaven.”
Let's assume that the passage I have just read is the one, or at least part of the one that Nathanael was reading.

Nathanael recognied Jesus

Remember, Nathanael has recognised Jesus for who he is on the strength of either a careful piece of observation of a simple word of knowledge. Jesus replies “You believe because I told you I saw you under the fig tree. You shall see greater things than that.” Then goes on to add “I tell you the truth, you shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending on the Son of Man.”
I'd just love to hear the rest of the conversation. Where did it go from there? What did Nathanael say next? The narrative moves on, so we can never know, but we can get a better understanding of Jesus' last statement.

Jesus' promise

Jesus picks up on the scripture that Nathanael was reading and promises that he will see greater things. Why shouldn't he – he has already been identified as a true Israelite, a truthful Israelite. By comparison Jacob was anything but truthful, yet God spoke to Jacob, and made a promise to be with him.

Son of man

Jesus ends with the title 'Son of Man' – a favourite title that Jesus gave himself, but how would Nathanael have understood it.
The phrase 'son of man' in the Old Testament (in our translation) appears in Psalms, Ezekiel, and Daniel. Mostly it simply means human being. In Daniel 7:13 in the dream of the four beasts, it clearly refers to the messiah, so it is quite possible that Nathanael would have understood it as confirmation of Philips statement 'We have found the one Moses wrote about in the Law, and about whom the prophets also wrote” - The Messiah. If he did he may also have realised that Jesus is saying that he is the way to heaven. An oblique reference perhaps to the fact that he would die for our sins and therefore make it possible to be once again connected to heaven.

Recognising Jesus

We don't have the luxury of a face-to-face meeting with Jesus, so I wondered what it was that triggered my belief. It certainly wasn't a simple word of knowledge, for me it was a much longer process. I had been attending church for a while and had been working through a number of things that might prevent me from believing. Was the Christian faith rational – the world I lived in was ordered and could be made sense of (at some level) – if Christianity denied that, I was never going to join. Those things over it was Jesus in the people I was friends with that finally made the difference.
Think back – what were the influences on your life that made you recognise that Jesus was the son of God? What was the one thing – if there was just one thing that first made you believe?
For Philip it may have been a command.
For Nathaniel it was Jesus' words: “Here is a true Israelite, in whom there is nothing false.”
For Jacob it was a dream.
Everyone has something that triggered their belief, or will trigger their belief.
All we can do is introduce them to Jesus and let Him do the rest.

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Carol Service Sermon (@Christ Church 13 Dec 2011) "Christmas starts with Christ(?)"

Christmas Starts with Christ - Pagan beginnings
At one level this is patently untrue.  Jesus was most definitely not born on December 25, not in December at all.  We have very little evidence when He was born, but the stories indicate that it was most likely towards the end of September. Then the weather would still have been good enough for Shepherds to be outside overnight.  In December it was too wet and cold for that.  So how did we get to December 25?
In the early Christian world there were many activities that we would find outrageous and entirely unacceptable .  There was a winter solstice festival celebrated in ancient Rome called Saturnalia. The festival celebrated the return of the unconquered sun.  The days had been shortening, now they were lengthening again, the sun was returning.  It lasted a full week, ending on December 25th.  In pagan Rome the law courts were suspended, charges of drunkenness, criminal damage, criminal injury and rape could not be made.  The festival was characterized by naked singing in the streets.  On the last day, someone was chosen as an enemy of Rome, they were fed generously then attacked and killed.
The early Christians were appalled at the excesses of this festival (along with much of the rest of life in Rome) and put an alternative festival on the day.
Much as we do on Halloween with our lights parties.
The birth of Jesus was a good choice – it picks up on the equivalent Christian symbolism.  The son of God is born, the light of the world has come, sin and darkness will be banished forever, we celebrate the coming of brighter days ahead.
When the Empire became officially Christian the Saturnalia festival was still widely supported and the official celebration of Christmas encouraged, with much of the over indulgence of Saturnalia being left in place so as not to upset too many of the population.
Then, just as there is now, there was a tension between Christ at Christmas and the other festivities that take place at that time of year.  Most of the traditions that go with Christmas have come from other pagan festivals from other times and other cultures, as Christianity spread throughout the world.

Christmas Starts with Christ - Times are changing
I've already use the title 'Light of the World' to describe Jesus.  It's especially true that a new baby brings light and hope into our lives.  When there is a birth among family or friends we make an effort to visit the baby as soon as we can.
I can remember visiting my sister when she gave birth to her first child (He's 30 now).  I knew nothing about babies and was very tentative.  I bent over the cot next to the hospital bed to get a closer look.  A small fist shot up, and only because I was young and had good reactions did I avoid a black eye.
I remember when our God Child was born desperately trying to find the hospital in a strange town, and then struggling to find the maternity ward which seemed miles away.  All that effort just to visit a baby, who will never have any memory of your visit.
We visit partly out of politeness , I'm sure, but also because babies represent our hope for the future.
We get a phone call and we go to visit, the shepherds went to worship, but then the announcement they received was somewhat more impressive than a phone call.  The baby they were visiting represented hope for the future, not just for them and their families but for the whole world. 
Most of us have about six months to prepare for the arrival of a new baby.  That's when the expectation begins.  What will he or she be like, what effect will they have on us and on the world around them. 
We've heard the prophecies of Jesus' birth, they were hundreds of years before the birth.  “ … the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counsellor, Mighty God, Everlasting  Father, Prince of Peace.
That's a lot to expect!
This child, though, changed the course of History.  His death on the cross paid for our sins and allowed us to make peace with God, and even to have good will to all men.
For a baby like that you'd expect an impressive announcement when He finally does arrive and you'd expect a good attendance.  That's just what Jesus got.  Wise men – Magi – Astrologers from the east traveled for many miles, so far that they didn't arrive until He was described as a Child. 
Christmas then began with Christ.  There is biblical evidence for the celebration of His birth.

Christmas Starts with Christ - Today
Again it looks like it's just not true.  Christmas, it seems begins with Marks & Spencer’s, and in September too – very appropriate!  We must remember though that for many Christmas is a festival of gluttony and laziness, because they do not know what they're celebrating. So much mythology is incorporated into our tradition it's hard for someone who doesn't attend church to work out what's real and what isn't.  They're in danger of throwing out the baby [pause]. 
If Christmas begins with Christ it is up to Christians to show that. 
There's nothing wrong with preparing for a celebration and having everything ready in good time, but when it comes to the celebration we must be sure that it's Jesus we are celebrating.
When I first joined this church the group of friends I was among used to meet at the midnight communion and exchange presents after the service.  The pattern was worship first and celebrate second.
When we first had our own children we continued the tradition.  About 11pm we got them up, put them in the car in their pyjamas, dressing gowns and coats, and took them to church.  The only babies, the only toddlers, the only children at midnight communion (in this church anyway).  We continued the pattern of putting Jesus first – worship first, then celebration.  Not only that NONE of them EVER got up early in the morning on Christmas day!
There are many things we can do during advent to prepare for the celebrations. Attending some of the special services, like the Carol service.  Delivering invitations, keeping appropriate advent calendars, using an advent wreath at home.  Whatever it is we must be sure that Christ is the focus, just as He should be in the rest of our lives.  That way our Christmas really can begin with Christ – and end with Christ.

There's a Christmas song from the seventies you may remember: 'I believe in Father Christmas' by Emerson, Lake and Palmer the last verse reads:

I wish you a hopeful Christmas
I wish you a brave new year
All anguish pain and sadness
Leave your heart and let your road be clear
They said there'll be snow at Christmas
They said there'll be peace on earth
Hallelujah Noel be it heaven or hell
The Christmas you get you deserve

If our Christmas begins with Christ and continues with Him, the Christmas we get will be far better than the one we deserve.

Saturday, December 17, 2011

1 Thes 5:12-24

Introductory Question
What does Christ Church Expect of us in terms of our behavior?
[Get Responses]
Reading 1 Thessalonians 5:12-24

Sermon
The Thessalonian church was a young church.  Indeed all the churches we read about in the New Testament were young churches.  This church was founded by Paul you can read about that in Acts chapter 17.  The young Christians were learning fast how to live the Christian life.   They had received praise for how well they were doing and were known as a dynamic congregation, {ref} but there was still a long way to go.
New Life / New Language
Tom Wright describes learning the Christian life as like learning a new language.  As a young child learning languages comes naturally.  Once you are older there is grammar to learn, which inevitable means learning rules, otherwise like Yoda you will always sound.  After a while though these new rules become natural, you no longer have to think about them, so you no longer sound like Yoda.
It's similar with the Christian life, there are rules that make living the life easier, once you know them and are practiced in living with them they become natural and don't require thought.
Even with a new language, (or even with an original one) its often worth re-visiting the rules to see if you've fallen into bad 'abits.
So lets take a look at some of the things Paul says and see how well we did.
1Th 5:12 Now we ask you, brothers, to respect those who work hard among you, who are over you in the Lord and who admonish you.
The very first thing that Paul asks of the Thessalonians is that they have respect for their leaders.  [Comment?]  Those, he says are the ones that work hard among you.  He says similar things in other letters too.  To Timothy he says:
1Ti 5:17 The elders who direct the affairs of the church well are worthy of double honour,  especially those whose work is preaching and teaching.
Well, I would pick that verse wouldn't I? Of course it only works if you believe that the affairs of the church are well directed.
The author of the letter to the Hebrews says:
Heb 13:17 Obey your leaders and submit to their authority. They keep watch over you as men who must give an account. Obey them so that their work will be a joy, not a burden, for that would be of no advantage to you.
So we are to have respect for our leaders, but then there's that word 'admonish'.  Not a word I hear in everyday conversation.  According to thefreedisctionary.com it has three meanings:
1. To reprove gently but earnestly.
2. To counsel (another) against something to be avoided; caution.
3. To remind of something forgotten or disregarded, as an obligation or a responsibility.
I wonder how you feel about being admonished.  My reaction is often very defensive “Who do you think you are?”  “What gives you the right ...?”  “Take the plank out of your own eye ...”.  I may not say it, (although I might – and more!) but you can bet I'm thinking it.  I can remember that my reaction was like that when I was spoken to by someone who I believed needed some lessons in moral living.  It was a reaction and when I thought about it a bit more, and prayed about my anger, I realized there was some truth in it.
I wonder now who I would readily accept admonishment from.  It depends, of course, on the issue and the approach – the key is in the first definition – to reprove GENTLY but EARNESTLY.
So let me leave that as a question for you to discuss over coffee.
Who would I accept admonishment from?
1Th 5:13b Live in peace with each other.
Peace does not mean we never have disagreements, but it does mean they must be settled with discussion and prayer.  It also means that our disagreements must never turn into fights – that just leads to factionalism and beaks up the fellowship.  Later, before communion there will be an opportunity to make your peace with any one you have anything against.  That's what the time is supposed to be for – not just a general greeting to all around the church.  I know it's said often – but that's because it's important and true – if you have anything between you and someone else in the congregation – make your peace BEFORE you take communion.
1Th 5:14 And we urge you, brothers, warn those who are idle, encourage the timid, help the weak, be patient with everyone. 
One preacher I read calls these the “won't dos”, the “want tos” and the “can't do's”. 
First the idle – the won't do's – what should we warn them about?  I am a firm believer in 'every member ministry', or the priesthood of all believers, or whatever you would like to call it.
1 Peter 2:9 "But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people belonging to God, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light."
Revelation 5:10, "You [that's Jesus] have made them to be a kingdom and priests to serve our God, and they will reign on the earth"
I believe that everyone has something to offer to the rest of the body of Christ.  If someone constantly refuses to take part in anything at all, then they are in danger of becoming detached from the congregation, and no longer being a part of the church.  We would not want that to happen to any one, so we must warn them.
The timid – the want tos – are characterized by the phrase “I'd like to but I couldn't ...”, or something similar.  I'm assuming that their response is the truth and not an excuse.  Paul says that we should encourage these people so that they will eventually try something – and probably be a great success at it.
The weak – the can't do's – those that have genuine difficulty taking part in any type of ministry.  These people need our support and help in doing whatever it is that are trying to do.
Be patient with everyone – let everyone travel on the road at their own speed – there is no minimum speed in the Christian life, the only need is to keep moving in the right direction.  There are plenty of times when I haven't even managed that.  Had I been condemned or rejected I would not be here now!
1Th 5:15 Make sure that nobody pays back wrong for wrong, but always try to be kind to each other and to everyone else.
This is the recipe for living in peace, but it goes deeper than that.  You've heard the expression “Don't get mad, get even”, I'm sure.  In the Christian life neither getting mad, nor getting even is an option.  When you accept Christ into your life any “rights” that you may have had in this area must be given up. 
It means the end of the fear of reprisals, blood feuds and vendettas.  It's the start of genuinely living in peace.
1Th 5:16 Be joyful always;
1Th 5:17 pray continually;
1Th 5:18 give thanks in all circumstances, for this is God’s will for you in Christ Jesus.

How can I be joyful when I get out of the bed the on the wrong side, let alone when more serious problems occur in life.  Here's a blog someone wrote on this verse, its called
“When God says always does He really mean ALWAYS?
Like ALL the time?
No matter what?
Without exception?
Every time?
Every circumstance?
Could He possibly mean THAT?
I mean- how is that even possible. Today I woke up with the remains of a migraine that will not quite go away and that has interposed on my sleep for two nights. Was I supposed to be joyful for THAT?
This afternoon I was ready to strangle someone I love very much. Someone I have cared and nurtured for many years. Was I supposed to be joyful THEN?
When I got home a car wouldn't start and we had to jump it. Was i supposed to be joyful THEN?
When I finally got inside, out of the cold wind (was I supposed to be joyful when I was cold?) and was met at the door with a "We have something to tell you" and the look from the supervising sibling that communicated that serious parental intervention was required. Then? Was I supposed to be joyful THEN?
REALLY?
Yes. Really! I was. Supposed to be that is. I wasn't. Joyful I mean.
How could God expect me to feel joy in all these circumstance? Uh- well- I guess He didn't command me to feel anything. He really just commanded me to BE something and He was gracious enough to tell me how.
Praying continually. Being thankful.
If I am supposed to be praying continually then it must mean that I am going to need a lot more of God and a lot less of me in order to be joyful.
And if I am "giving thanks in all thing" I am going to be awfully busy. In fact I will have little time left over for feeling sorry for myself or feeling angry at mistakes or envious of another's abundance.
So I think I better have a "do over" today- Thank you Lord for the headache: thank You that I have to slow down, and for medicine that can work, and family that cares that I am in pain.
Thank you Lord for the mistake of my child: thank You for the opportunity for a lesson to be learned, and thank You for ready solutions, and thank you for the opportunity I will have to apologize when he gets home, and thank You for love that covers a multitude of sins.
Thank You Lord for a car with a bad battery: thank You for a responsible son who doesn't expect me to fix everything for him, and thank You for jumper cables, and thank You for a car at all and that it still runs after 180,000 miles.
Thank You for the cold wind: I like sweaters.
Thank you Lord for my young child and her sins: thank You for the chance to share how You hate lies, and thank You that You hate lies, and thank You for creative ideas, and thank You for a big sister who cares for her younger sister, and thank You that I was with her for this valuable lesson.
Thank You that I do not have feel happy to BE joyful.”
1Th 5:19 Do not put out the Spirit’s fire;
1Th 5:20 do not treat prophecies with contempt. 
Some of the men from Christ Church recently attended the CVM mens day called “Iron Sharpens Iron”.  Carl Beech, who used to be at the Baptist Church, told a story that illustrates why we should listen to Gods spirit and never reject what He is saying to us.
He'd been doing door to door evangelism.  At one house the woman had be very abusive and told him to get lost.  You can imagine the language!  Some time later he was walking down the same street and the spirit said “knock on that door”.  Carl was not impressed, but he knocked on the door as an act of obedience.  He received much the same response as the previous time.  A while later, and walking down that same road again he heard “knock on that door”.  This time the act of obedience was much harder to perform than the last time – but the result was very different.  He was invited in!  She explained that she had been preparing to kill her self when he first called and that God had been speaking to her about his next visit!
The Holy Spirit speaks into our lives in many different ways, recently, on our weekend away we were assured of God's love for all of us.  This is prophecy – God speaking to us – it is intended to make a difference, just as predictions of the future are intended – mostly – not to come true!
1Th 5:21 Test everything. Hold on to the good.
Scripture!, Scripture! Scripture!
It's the only place we can go to find out if the messages we are receiving really do come from God, or whether the enemy is conning us.
My DIYers Bible contains everything you need to know to repair and improve your home – except mine doesn't talk about plastic water pipes because it was written in the seventies and things change.
People don't; God doesn't.  The Bible was written 2000+ years ago and is just as relevant now as it was then!
1Th 5:22 Avoid every kind of evil.
Run Away!
This is the only thing the Bible tells you not to get involved in something.
1Th 5:23 May God himself, the God of peace,  sanctify you through and through. May your whole spirit, soul and body be kept blameless  at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
1Th 5:24 The one who calls you is faithful and he will do it.
Jesus is faithful.  He has already done it!  He has made it possible for you to be at peace with God.  Through His death on the cross our sins can be forgiven and our relationship with the Holy one restored.  Through his resurrection we are shown the life to come.
1Th 5:23 May God himself, the God of peace,  sanctify you through and through. May your whole spirit, soul and body be kept blameless  at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
1Th 5:24 The one who calls you is faithful and he will do it.

Friday, November 18, 2011

Sarah Millican @ Hammersmith (10 Nov)

Having seen her on TV, it was generally agreed that it would be good to see her live.  Our daughter duly obliged and booked some tickets.  So off to Hammersmith we went.  The theatre itself started it's life as a 1930's cinema.  It's been through a lot, no doubt, but is now in need of a facelift.  I do hope they remove the fly-paper floor coverings from beneath the seats.
Sarah starts slowly.  I was beginning to wonder when she would really get going, but get going she does.  By the time the interval arrived I'd all but forgotten the slow start.  The second half started as the first ended.
Her subjects are relationships and bodily functions.  Many of the jokes would keep an eight year old boy amused, but also work well with adults.  She is different from her TV appearance character.  The jokes are cruder, sometimes with a yuk factor thrown in.  Most notably there is prolific swearing.  She says she likes to swear.  Personally, I don't care what she likes - what she does needs to be funny, that's why I came to see her.  Swearing is NOT funny in its own right.  With one or two exceptions it did not enhance the comedy at all - so should probably be left out.  Especially in the second half there is a degree of audience interaction.  This leads some of the more outgoing ones (drunk ones?) to think they can take on the comic.  It really doesn't matter how she deals with this, insults, tirades etc all enhance the show - the audience in general is very much on her side, but the clever building of jokes against them is by far the best and really enhances the show.  We had one excellent example of that.
So, if you don't mind the subjects and the style you will find the shows very funny.  I'm glad I went, it was an enjoyable evening.